EDITORIAL 18 November 2025

Hasina death sentence is a travesty of justice

Context & The Gist

The death sentence awarded to former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina by the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) has sparked international concern. The article argues that the verdict is a ‘travesty of justice’ due to a biased tribunal, a flawed legal process, and the caretaker government’s political motivations, potentially destabilizing Bangladesh and posing a diplomatic challenge for India.

Key Arguments & Nuances

  • Judicial Bias & Fairness: The ICT, composed solely of Bangladeshi judges perceived as partisan, lacked the impartiality expected of international tribunals. The absence of a robust defense for Sheikh Hasina, including a state-appointed lawyer who did not call witnesses or seek adjournments, further undermined the fairness of the proceedings.
  • Political Vendetta: The verdict is viewed as a politically motivated act of revenge by the current caretaker government against Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League party, evidenced by the swiftness of the trial and the government’s enthusiastic reception of the sentence.
  • Rise of Islamist Politics & Internal Instability: The article highlights a concerning rise in Islamist politics in Bangladesh since Hasina’s ouster, fueled by socio-economic grievances like unemployment and corruption, posing a threat to minority communities. The caretaker government’s heavy-handed approach has exacerbated these divisions.
  • Regional Implications & India’s Dilemma: The death sentence and the potential for further political instability in Bangladesh present a diplomatic challenge for India, which faces a request for Sheikh Hasina’s extradition while balancing regional security concerns.

UPSC Syllabus Relevance

  • GS Paper II: International Relations – India’s neighborhood policy, bilateral relations with Bangladesh, and the impact of political instability in neighboring countries.
  • GS Paper II: Governance – Issues related to the independence of the judiciary, rule of law, and the functioning of democratic institutions.
  • GS Paper III: Internal Security – The rise of Islamist politics, threats to minority rights, and the implications for regional security.

Prelims Data Bank

  • International Crimes Tribunal (ICT): Established to prosecute individuals accused of committing crimes during the 1971 Liberation War of Bangladesh.
  • Bangladesh Liberation War (1971): Conflict leading to the independence of Bangladesh from Pakistan.
  • Awami League: A major political party in Bangladesh, historically led by Sheikh Hasina.

Mains Critical Analysis

The situation in Bangladesh presents a complex interplay of political, legal, and security challenges. The ICT verdict, widely perceived as biased, raises serious concerns about the rule of law and judicial independence in Bangladesh. This erodes the credibility of the caretaker government and casts a shadow over the legitimacy of the upcoming elections. The caretaker government’s actions, rather than fostering stability, appear to be exacerbating existing tensions and creating a fertile ground for radicalization.

From a PESTLE perspective, the Political factors are dominant, with the verdict being a clear demonstration of political maneuvering. Economic factors like unemployment and corruption are underlying drivers of discontent. Social divisions are widening, particularly concerning minority rights. Technological factors are less prominent in this immediate context. Legal processes have been compromised, and Environmental factors are not directly relevant.

The case also highlights a critical gap in the international community’s response. While concerns have been raised, a stronger and more unified stance is needed to uphold principles of fair trial and judicial independence. India’s position is particularly crucial, as it navigates the delicate balance between maintaining good relations with Bangladesh and upholding its own values.

Value Addition

  • Muhammad Yunus: Nobel Peace Prize laureate and founder of Grameen Bank, whose regime is criticized in the article for its hostility towards Sheikh Hasina.
  • India-Bangladesh Relations: Historically strong, but strained by issues like illegal immigration, border disputes, and water sharing.
  • Principle of Natural Justice: The ICT proceedings appear to have violated this principle, which guarantees a fair hearing and an unbiased tribunal.

The Way Forward

  • Immediate Measure: India should engage in quiet diplomacy with the Bangladesh caretaker government, urging a review of the ICT verdict and emphasizing the importance of a fair and inclusive political process.
  • Long-term Reform: Strengthening democratic institutions in Bangladesh, promoting judicial independence, and addressing socio-economic grievances are crucial for long-term stability. International support for these reforms is essential.

Read the original article for full context.

Visit Original Source ↗
Related Context
17 Nov 2025
Power grab: On Pakistan’s General Asim Munir

On November 13, 2025, Pakistan passed the 27th amendment to its Constitution, formalizing the military's significant influence over the country's gove...

Read Analysis
17 Nov 2025
EC has trust issues but to find vote chor, Congress may look in the mirror

Following its defeat in the Bihar election on November 17, 2025, the Congress party has once again alleged “vote chori” (vote theft) and accused the E...

Read Analysis
14 Nov 2025
Sheikh Hasina needs to take responsibility. But Mohammad Yunus regime raises concerns

Opinion Sheikh Hasina needs to take responsibility. But Mohammad Yunus regime raises concerns The coming weeks will be decisive in shaping the countr...

Read Analysis
14 Nov 2025
Who killed the victims at Nithari? 19 years later, Surendra Koli’s acquittal indicts criminal justice system

The recent acquittal of Surendra Koli by the Supreme Court in the 2006 Nithari murders case has reignited concerns about the Indian criminal justice s...

Read Analysis