​Mob rule: On migrants, rising hate crimes in India

Editorial  |   | 

Key Points

  • Core Issue: Escalation of identity-based mob violence against internal migrants based on superficial markers like language, region, or appearance, resulting in deaths of Indian citizens (e.g., from Chhattisgarh, West Bengal, Tripura).
  • Trigger Mechanism: The current wave is linked to the politicization of the 'illegal infiltration' narrative, which emboldens street-level vigilantism against perceived 'outsiders'.
  • Central Argument: The state machinery and political leadership have failed to issue an unambiguous and forceful rejection of this violence, directly compromising constitutional guarantees of life and security (Article 21) for vulnerable populations.

Summary

Recent violent incidents across various states demonstrate a disturbing trend where mobs are attacking and killing Indian nationals, falsely labeling them as foreign migrants (specifically Bangladeshi or Chinese) based on non-deterministic markers. This vigilante behavior, often resulting in lynching, signals a severe breakdown in internal security and civic trust, heavily exacerbated by inflammatory political campaigning centered on migration control.

GS paper relevance

  • GS I (Social Issues): Threat to national integration and harmony arising from regionalism and ethnic profiling.
  • GS II (Governance/Federalism): State accountability in maintaining law and order, particularly concerning inter-state migrant workers and protection of fundamental rights.
  • GS IV (Ethics): The imperative of upholding the rule of law against majoritarian assertiveness and the ethical failure in protecting the most vulnerable sections of society.

Prelims Pointers

  • Protection of life and personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.
  • Constitutional protections for citizens against discrimination based on place of birth or residence (though not directly relevant to the attack, it frames citizenship security).
  • Concept of Internal Security management challenges arising from socio-linguistic friction zones.

Mains Analysis

The recurrence of identity-based violence signifies deep-seated structural and political failures:

Causes:

  • Political Exploitation: The linkage between electoral strategy (e.g., anti-immigrant rhetoric) and street-level action creates a permissive environment for violence, where perpetrators believe their actions align with a broader political goal.
  • Social Stratification: Persistent prejudice against specific regional groups, such as those from the Northeast being racially profiled as 'Chinese', highlights the failure of national integration efforts.
  • Policing Deficit: While arrests are made post-facto, the failure lies in proactive intelligence gathering and immediate, disproportionate response to nascent signs of mob formation or incitement, leading to the perception that rule of law is optional in such cases.

Implications:

  • Economic Disruption: Such violence severely jeopardizes the free movement of labour necessary for key sectors (like construction, agriculture), disproportionately affecting economically weaker migrants.
  • Federal Strain: Attacks on citizens from one state while working in another create friction between state governments regarding accountability and victim compensation.
  • Erosion of Civic Trust: When citizens cannot trust the state to protect them from neighbours based on arbitrary suspicion, the social contract weakens significantly, encouraging self-help or radicalization.

Value Addition Table

Dimension Key Insight
Rule of Law vs. Vigilantism Mob justice bypasses due process (Article 21), replacing judicial scrutiny with impulsive, identity-based accusation.
National Cohesion The failure to recognize internal diversity as a strength is weaponized by focusing on superficial differences (language/appearance) to create 'insider/outsider' binaries.
Political Accountability Political narratives must actively de-escalate identity fissures; rhetoric that benefits electorally in one region cannot be allowed to incite violence elsewhere.

Way Forward

  • Political Consensus on Condemnation: All political parties must issue unqualified condemnation of identity-based vigilantism, decoupling security from electoral gains.
  • Strengthening Police Response: Implementing rapid response protocols specifically designed to intercept and disperse mobs before lethal force is used, alongside rigorous investigation into the sources of incitement.
  • Legal Deterrence: Ensure swift prosecution and stringent punishment for perpetrators of mob violence, perhaps drawing lessons from past Supreme Court observations on curbing lynching, thereby establishing specific deterrence.
  • Civic Education: Launch targeted, state-sponsored campaigns emphasizing the constitutional rights of all Indian citizens and countering regional/ethnic stereotypes, promoting shared citizenship.